Model Year | 2007 | 2015 | |
Model | Chevrolet Uplander | Chevrolet Cruze | |
Engine | 3.9L V6 OHV-2v 179 kW@6000 325 Nm@4800 |
1.8L I4 DOHC-4v 103 kW@6300 167 Nm@3800 |
|
Transmission | 4-speed automatic | 6-speed manual | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,076 mm | 2,685 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,192 mm | 4,597 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,829 mm | 1,796 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,831 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,028 kg | 1,399 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 95 L | 59 L | 36 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,011 mm | 998 mm | -997 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,521 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,417 mm | 1,346 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,013 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 988 mm | 963 mm | 25 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,554 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,565 mm | 1,331 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 988 mm | 899 mm | 89 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 970 mm | 0 mm | 970 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,234 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,227 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 919 mm | 0 mm | 919 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,921 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,974 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 762 L | 425 L | 337 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,098 L | 15.0 | -13 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,865 L | 15.0 | -12 L |
2007 Chevrolet Uplander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr Minivan 240-horsepower 3.9L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Good for hauling the family and cargo . see full Chevrolet Uplander review |
2015 Chevrolet Cruze Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2016 | The old Chevrolet Cruze, like the Ford Focus, had a rear seat on the tight side even by compact sedan standards. According to the specs, the new one has only gained a few tenths of legroom. But the improvement feels much larger. Chevrolet claims that rear knee room (not a standard spec) has increased by two inches, and this aligns much better with my perceptions. Some competitors, including the Honda Civic, continue to offer more rear seat space. But the new Cruze's back seat could be the most comfortable in the class for two average-sized men. With a position well above the floor, the rear seat cushion provides much better thigh support than the typical sedan, much less the typical compact sedan. The Civic has a lower rear cushion and insufficient foot space under its front seats, squandering its on-paper legroom advantage. Up front the Cruze has comfortable seats (though, like those in the Civic, without adjustable lumbar support) but shoulder room typical of a compact car. The Civic has two more inches of shoulder room and feels more like a midsize sedan in the front seat. Both cars have good driving positions with reasonably compact instrument panels. In L and LS trim, the new Cruze has a 14.9-cubic-foot trunk, nearly identical to that of the new Civic and about as large as you'll find in the class. But the LT and Premier have a compact spare tire that reduces cargo volume to 13.6 cubic feet. Still pretty good. Next year both cars will also be available as hatchbacks. see full Chevrolet Cruze review |
2015 Chevrolet Cruze Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Cruze's rear seat is among the tightest in a compact sedan, and the diesel engine doesn't affect this. Though rear seat headroom is abundant, adults will feel a bit cramped even behind a driver of average height. The Jetta's rear seat has a little less headroom but far more legroom. So the best option depends on whether your rear seat passengers have long legs or long torsos. see full Chevrolet Cruze review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Cruze.