Model Year | 2006 | 2016 | |
Model | Chevrolet Uplander | GMC Terrain | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 121.1 in | 112.5 in | 8.6 in |
Length | 204.4 in | 185.5 in | 18.9 in |
Width | 72.0 in | 72.8 in | -0.8 in |
Height | 72.1 in | 66.3 in | 5.8 in |
Curb Weight | 4470 lb. | 3792 lb. | 678 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 25.0 gal. | 18.8 gal. | 6.2 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 39.8 in | 39.8 in | 0 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.9 in | 55.7 in | 4.2 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.8 in | 55.1 in | 0.7 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 39.9 in | 41.2 in | -1.3 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 38.9 in | 39.2 in | -0.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 61.2 in | 55.3 in | 5.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 61.6 in | 51.3 in | 10.3 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 38.9 in | 39.9 in | -1 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 38.2 in | 0.0 in | 38.2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 48.6 in | 0.0 in | 48.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 48.3 in | 0.0 in | 48.3 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 36.2 in | 0.0 in | 36.2 in |
Total Legroom | 115 in (over 3 rows) | 81.1 in (over 2 rows) | 33.9 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 26.9 ft3 | 31.6 ft3 | -4.7 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 74.1 ft3 | 31.6 | 42.5 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 136.5 ft3 | 63.9 ft3 | 72.6 ft3 |
2006 Chevrolet Uplander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr Minivan 240-horsepower 3.9L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Good for hauling the family and cargo . see full Chevrolet Uplander review |
2005 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 200-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Lots of room, good headroom and legroom see full Chevrolet Uplander review |
2005 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 200-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Lots of adjustment possibilities, and it fits me well - comfortable for long drives see full Chevrolet Uplander review |
2016 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2015 | 4dr SUV 301-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seat room is plentiful, and because rear seat can be slid forward and back, you can shift between needing more leg room and using more of the cargo area. We had traded in a 2015 Dodge Journey for the Terrain, because of safety concerns, but realized after we had it for awhile, the rear seat of the Journey was not able to go back far enough into the cargo area, and because of the bulky and high mounted head rests, you felt trapped. The Terrain does not have these issues and feels much more roomy and comfortable. The rear seats are supportive and not at all like some back seats that feel like they were an afterthought. see full GMC Terrain review |