Model Year | 2007 | 2015 | |
Model | Chevrolet Uplander | Honda Odyssey | |
Engine | 3.9L V6 OHV-2v 240 hp@6000 240 lb-ft@4800 |
3.5L V6 w/DoD OHC-4v 248 hp@5700 250 lb-ft@4800 |
|
Transmission | 4-speed automatic | 6-speed automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,076 mm | 3,000 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 5,192 mm | 5,154 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,829 mm | 2,012 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,831 mm | 1,737 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,028 kg | 1,994 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 95 L | 79 L | 16 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,011 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,521 mm | 1,636 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,417 mm | 1,478 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,013 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 988 mm | 1,003 mm | 987 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,554 mm | 1,613 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,565 mm | 1,679 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 988 mm | 1,039 mm | 987 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 970 mm | 965 mm | 5 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,234 mm | 1,547 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,227 mm | 1,229 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 919 mm | 1,077 mm | 918 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,921 mm (over 3 rows) | 3,155 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 762 L | 1,087 L | 761 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,098 L | 2,636 L | 0 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,865 L | 4,205 L | -1 L |
2007 Chevrolet Uplander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr Minivan 240-horsepower 3.9L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Good for hauling the family and cargo . see full Chevrolet Uplander review |
2015 Honda Odyssey Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2014 | I test a large crossover and think, "This third-row seat isn't bad." Then I drive a minivan and marvel at home much roomier it is inside than even the roomiest crossovers. This advantage increases the farther back in the vehicle you sit. Back in the third row, it's simply no contest. Among minivans, the Odyssey is the roomiest of the bunch. It's the only minivan with over 40 inches of legroom in each of its three rows. Total up the differences in the official specs, and the Toyota Sienna comes up nearly ten inches short (though the difference doesn't seem nearly so large in reality, maybe an inch or two). A Chrysler Town & Country? Over fourteen inches. A Toyota Highlander crossover has legroom specs similar to the Chrysler minivan, but its third row feels much more cramped. Moral of the story: don't trust the specs, sit in the cars yourself. In cabin breadth, the official specs have the Odyssey about equal to the Town & Country and a little narrower than the Sienna, but subjectively both the Honda and the Toyota feel broader and more open than the Chrysler. Then there's access to the rear rows. The feature most associated with minivans, their sliding side doors, are easier to open in tight parking spaces and provide a much larger opening. In terms of seat comfort, the Odyssey falls a little short of the Sienna, if only because it doesn't offer lounge chair-like legrests in the second row. Then again, for anyone over five feet tall to use these in the Toyota the second row seat must be slid back so far as to render the third row unusable. Either minivan has more comfortable second-row seats than most crossovers, including the Highlander, and third-row comfort is simply no contest. The Chrysler's second row seats aren't as comfortable, as they are more thinly constructed to enable them to fold beneath the floor. The Odyssey, Sienna, and Highlander can each be equipped to carry eight passengers (though the lounge seats in the Sienna eliminate one spot, and the three in the third row of the Highlander best have short legs). The Chrysler minivans can only seat seven. see full Honda Odyssey review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Honda Odyssey.