Model Year | 2006 | 2014 | |
Model | Chevrolet Uplander | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Engine | 3.9L V6 OHV-2v 240 hp@6000 240 lb-ft@4800 |
3.0L V6 OHC-4v 224 hp@6250 215 lb-ft@3750 |
|
Transmission | 4-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 121.1 in | 105.1 in | 16 in |
Length | 204.4 in | 183.3 in | 21.1 in |
Width | 72.0 in | 70.9 in | 1.1 in |
Height | 72.1 in | 66.1 in | 6 in |
Curb Weight | 4520 lb. | 3571 lb. | 949 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 25.0 gal. | 16.6 gal. | 8.4 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 39.8 in | 40.6 in | -0.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.9 in | 56.4 in | 3.5 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.8 in | 52.6 in | 3.2 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 39.9 in | 40.9 in | -1 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 38.9 in | 38.4 in | 0.5 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 61.2 in | 56.0 in | 5.2 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 61.6 in | 51.7 in | 9.9 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 38.9 in | 37.3 in | 1.6 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 38.2 in | 35.7 in | 2.5 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 48.6 in | 50.6 in | -2 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 48.3 in | 39.4 in | 8.9 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 36.2 in | 28.2 in | 8 in |
Total Legroom | 115 in (over 3 rows) | 106.4 in (over 3 rows) | 8.6 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 26.9 ft3 | 10.3 ft3 | 16.6 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 74.1 ft3 | 34.2 ft3 | 39.9 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 136.5 ft3 | 63.3 ft3 | 73.2 ft3 |
2006 Chevrolet Uplander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr Minivan 240-horsepower 3.9L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Good for hauling the family and cargo . see full Chevrolet Uplander review |
2005 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 200-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Lots of room, good headroom and legroom see full Chevrolet Uplander review |
2005 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 200-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Lots of adjustment possibilities, and it fits me well - comfortable for long drives see full Chevrolet Uplander review |
2014 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander.