| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Chrysler 200 and 2018 Audi TT Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 | |
| Model | Chrysler 200 | Audi TT | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 2dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 108.0 in | 98.6 in | 9.4 in |
| Length | 192.3 in | 164.7 in | 27.6 in |
| Width | 73.6 in | 72.1 in | 1.5 in |
| Height | 58.7 in | 53.2 in | 5.5 in |
| Curb Weight | 3473 lb. | 3164 lb. | 309 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 15.8 gal. | 14.5 gal. | 1.3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.7 in | 37.1 in | 0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.5 in | 53.6 in | 4.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.5 in | 0.0 in | 54.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.2 in | 41.1 in | 1.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.4 in | 33.8 in | 3.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.7 in | 47.9 in | 8.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 52.7 in | 0.0 in | 52.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.6 in | 28.9 in | 8.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 79.8 in (over 2 rows) | 70 in (over 2 rows) | 9.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 16.0 ft3 | 12.0 ft3 | 4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 16.0 ft3 | 25.1 ft3 | -9.1 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chrysler 200
| 2016 Chrysler 200 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Chrysler 200 shares its basic structure with the compact Dodge Dart. This basis is most evident in the back seat, where legroom is decent but hiproom is considerably tighter than in most midsize sedans. Thanks to the stylish roof line, rear headroom is also in short supply. The Fusion's rear seat isn't nearly the roomiest in the class, but it is roomier and more comfortable than the Chrysler's. If you need a truly roomy rear seat and all-wheel-drive in a somewhat affordable midsize sedan, buy the Legacy. see full Chrysler 200 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chrysler 200
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chrysler 200.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Audi TT
| 2018 Audi TT Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| I really liked the seats in the Audi TT I reviewed a couple of years ago. Somehow I liked those in the TT RS less, even though they appear to be the same seats, just with additional adjustments. This time around the bolsters didn't provide much lateral support to my lower torso, yet felt too close together higher up even when adjusted all of the way out. I don't think I've grown significantly wider. Adding adjustable bolsters to the seats might have made them fit me worse than the fixed bolsters of the earlier seat. Your experience might vary. The tested Porsche 718 Cayman S was fitted with the base seats. As such they had few adjustments and provided only a modest amount of lateral support, but were reasonably comfortable. Three optional seats have larger side bolsters, more adjustments, or both. The BMW M2's front seats, with adjustable bolsters, deliver very good if not outstanding support and comfort. And back seats? Adults of average height can squeeze into the BMW's in a pinch. Folks under five-foot-six might do the same in the Audi's if those up front don't have their seats all the way back. The Porsche has no rear seats. see full Audi TT review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Audi TT
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Audi TT.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chrysler models.
