Model Year | 2009 | 2016 | |
Model | Chrysler Aspen | GMC Terrain | |
Engine | 5.7L V8 OHV-2v 376 hp@5600 401 lb-ft@3600 |
3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 301 hp@6500 272 lb-ft@4800 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,028 mm | 2,858 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,100 mm | 4,712 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,930 mm | 1,849 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,887 mm | 1,684 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,295 kg | 1,883 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 102 L | 71 L | 31 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,509 mm | 1,415 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,494 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,052 mm | 1,046 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 996 mm | 2 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,514 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,453 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 950 mm | 1,013 mm | 949 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 996 mm | 0 mm | 996 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,496 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,219 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 876 mm | 0 mm | 876 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,878 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,060 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 538 L | 895 L | -357 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,906 L | 31.6 | -30.6 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,900 L | 1,809 L | 1 L |
2009 Chrysler Aspen Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 | 4dr SUV 376-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed automatic AWD w/low range |
Plenty of room for 6 footers see full Chrysler Aspen review |
2008 | 4dr SUV 303-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Its equipped with two captains chairs and a console for passenegers. Plenty of room all around and easy exit and entry. see full Chrysler Aspen review |
2016 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2015 | 4dr SUV 301-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seat room is plentiful, and because rear seat can be slid forward and back, you can shift between needing more leg room and using more of the cargo area. We had traded in a 2015 Dodge Journey for the Terrain, because of safety concerns, but realized after we had it for awhile, the rear seat of the Journey was not able to go back far enough into the cargo area, and because of the bulky and high mounted head rests, you felt trapped. The Terrain does not have these issues and feels much more roomy and comfortable. The rear seats are supportive and not at all like some back seats that feel like they were an afterthought. see full GMC Terrain review |