| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2021 Chrysler Pacifica and 2018 GMC Terrain Specifications
| Model Year | 2021 | 2018 | |
| Model | Chrysler Pacifica | GMC Terrain | |
| Engine | 3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 287 hp@6400 262 lb-ft@4000 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 252 hp@5500 260 lb-ft@2500 |
|
| Transmission | 9-speed automatic | 9-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,089 mm | 2,725 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,189 mm | 4,630 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 2,022 mm | 1,839 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,775 mm | 1,661 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,051 kg | 1,616 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 56 L | 16 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,019 mm | 1,016 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,621 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,499 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,044 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 978 mm | -977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,600 mm | 1,412 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,646 mm | 1,316 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,008 mm | 990 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 983 mm | 0 mm | 983 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,554 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,257 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 927 mm | 0 mm | 927 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,962 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 915 L | 838 L | 77 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,478 L | 29.6 | -27.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,979 L | 1,792 L | 2 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2021 Chrysler Pacifica
| 2021 Chrysler Pacifica Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2020 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 287-horsepower 3.6L V6 9-speed automatic FWD |
The front seats in the other mini-vans ftom Kia, Honda, and Toyota felt constricting and my spouse loves the ample hip room the Pacifica front seats provide. see full Chrysler Pacifica review |
| 2021 Chrysler Pacifica Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2020 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 287-horsepower 3.6L V6 9-speed automatic FWD |
The 2nd row seats are firm and provide enough legroom for persons <6ft but="" do="" not="" slide="" fwd="" backwd="" 3rd="" row="" seating="" is="" comfortable="" for="" short="" durations="" persons="">6ft but the 2nd row seat backs can be folded flat for more room if not occupied or stored in the floor to provide generous legroom if passengers ride in the 3rd row. see full Chrysler Pacifica review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain
| 2018 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2018 | The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain.
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chrysler models.
