Model Year | 2004 | 2012 | |
Model | Chrysler Sebring | Chevrolet Camaro | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | |||
Difference | |||
Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
2004 Chrysler Sebring Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2004 | 4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 2.7L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
very comfortable for my "football player" frame of 6ft 230lbs - lots of room to stretch out as well as hip and shoulder room. see full Chrysler Sebring review |
2004 | 4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 2.7L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
again, lots of room to spread out - head tends to hit the back window however when going over bumps - probably not a problem with most riders though. see full Chrysler Sebring review |
2012 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seat is small and unlike the nonconvertable does not have a center seat. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
2012 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 2dr Convertible 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seating is not meant for a Adult but a child or a set of golf clubs.. & a few complaints over the comfort.. in long drives.. any thing over a hour or more. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |