| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2004 Chrysler Sebring and 2012 Ford Taurus Specifications
| Model Year | 2004 | 2012 | |
| Model | Chrysler Sebring | Ford Taurus | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2004 Chrysler Sebring
| 2004 Chrysler Sebring Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2004 | 4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 2.7L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
very comfortable for my "football player" frame of 6ft 230lbs - lots of room to stretch out as well as hip and shoulder room. see full Chrysler Sebring review |
| 2004 | 4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 2.7L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
again, lots of room to spread out - head tends to hit the back window however when going over bumps - probably not a problem with most riders though. see full Chrysler Sebring review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Taurus
| 2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Three adult room in the back seat - comfortably! see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chrysler models.
