| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Chrysler Sebring and 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2014 | |
| Model | Chrysler Sebring | Mercedes-Benz GLK | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 OHC-4v 175 kW@6400 315 Nm@4000 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 225 kW@6500 370 Nm@3500 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,766 mm | 2,756 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,841 mm | 4,529 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,808 mm | 1,887 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,499 mm | 1,699 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,587 kg | 1,782 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 64 L | 66 L | -2 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,016 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,433 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,359 mm | 1,351 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,052 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 1,008 mm | 974 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,433 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,351 mm | 1,334 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 892 mm | 63 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,943 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 394 L | 660 L | -266 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.9 | 1,549 L | 12.9 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Chrysler Sebring
| 2010 Chrysler Sebring Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 173-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Beats Accord in seat comfort. see full Chrysler Sebring review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK
| 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Expect the GLK to grow when it is next fully redesigned. A smaller MLK is on the way to battle the upcoming Audi Q3 and just-arrived BMW X1. For 2013, the GLK's body structure remains essentially the same, so rear seat knee room remains just sufficient for a man of average height sitting behind another such man. (Headroom, on the other hand, is abundant.) Among competitors, only the Infiniti EX37 has a tighter rear seat. The Audi, BMW, and Volvo all offer knees another inch or three. Seat comfort is debatable. To my bottom, the GLK's seats feel overly firm. Cargo space is similarly short of the segment average. The GLK's 54.7 cubic feet isn't far behind the Audi's 57.3 but well below the X3's 63.3. That truncated tail has a downside beyond aesthetics. But do these shortcomings really matter? For most people nearly all of the time, there's enough space. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK
| 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 168hp 2.1L I4 Diesel 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
We are a couple with no kids and we rarely have visitors so the cramped rear seating is not a problem. Someone with teenage kids will want to seriously reconsider before getting a GLK. I know my Mom would not appreciate the ingress/egress ease as she has some limited mobility. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chrysler models.
