Chrysler Town & Country (2013) vs. Chevrolet SS (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2013 Chrysler Town & Country and 2016 Chevrolet SS specs.
2013 Chrysler Town & Country and 2016 Chevrolet SS Specifications
Model Year |
2013 |
2016 |
|
Model |
Chrysler Town & Country |
Chevrolet SS |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr Minivan, ext. |
4dr Sedan |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
3,078 mm |
2,916 mm |
1 mm |
Length |
5,144 mm |
4,966 mm |
1 mm |
Width |
1,999 mm |
1,897 mm |
0 mm |
Height |
1,725 mm |
1,471 mm |
0 mm |
Curb Weight |
2,110 kg |
1,813 kg |
1 kg |
Fuel Capacity |
76 L |
71 L |
5 L |
Headroom, Row 1 |
1,011 mm |
983 mm |
-982 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,618 mm |
1,501 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,483 mm |
1,453 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 |
1,034 mm |
1,074 mm |
0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 |
998 mm |
965 mm |
33 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,628 mm |
1,499 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,651 mm |
1,473 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 |
927 mm |
1,008 mm |
926 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 |
963 mm |
0 mm |
963 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
1,575 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 |
1,237 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 |
831 mm |
0 mm |
831 mm |
Total Legroom |
2,791 mm (over 3 rows) |
2,083 mm (over 2 rows) |
0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
934 L |
464 L |
470 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
2,359 L |
16.4 |
-14.4 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
4,072 L |
16.4 |
-12.4 L |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Chrysler Town & Country
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Chrysler Town & Country.
Be the first!
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
2015 |
Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat.
Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all
Chrysler models.