| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Chrysler Empty and 2013 Ford Taurus Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2013 | |
| Model | Chrysler Empty | Ford Taurus | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 mm (over 1 row) | 0 mm (over 1 row) | 0 mm |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Chrysler Empty
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2006 Chrysler Empty.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Taurus
| 2013 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chrysler models.
