| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Dodge Challenger and 2018 GMC Terrain Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2018 | |
| Model | Dodge Challenger | GMC Terrain | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,946 mm | 2,725 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,022 mm | 4,630 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,923 mm | 1,839 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,448 mm | 1,661 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,687 kg | 1,564 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 56 L | 16 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,003 mm | 1,016 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,478 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,389 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 950 mm | 978 mm | -28 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,412 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,306 mm | 1,316 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 828 mm | 1,008 mm | 827 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,895 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 459 L | 838 L | -379 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 16.2 | 1,792 L | 15.2 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Dodge Challenger
| 2009 Dodge Challenger Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 376-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Challenger has tilt/telescope steering wheel that can be positioned exactly where you want see full Dodge Challenger review |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 376-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
I can set the front seat in a comfortable location for myself and still have room behind me for a rear seat passenger. Seat can be positioned for a more chair-like seating position. see full Dodge Challenger review |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 376-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Larger/wider back seat with capability of handling modern child seats. Adequate space for occasional adult use of back seat. see full Dodge Challenger review |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 376-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
With the tilt/telescope steering wheel and the larger interior room vs. its competitors this car is easily adjusted to fit the driver and I get out still feeling good after all-day drives. see full Dodge Challenger review |
| 2009 | 2dr Coupe 376-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The most comfortable seats I have ever been in can drive all day and back does not hurt. see full Dodge Challenger review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain
| 2018 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2018 | The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain.
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes
See TrueDelta's information for all Dodge models.
