Dodge Charger (2015) vs. BMW X1 (2016) Specs

vs.

◆

2015 Dodge Charger and 2016 BMW X1 Specifications

Model Year	2015	2016
Model	Dodge Charger	BMW X1
Engine
Transmission
Drivetrain
Body	4dr Sedan	4dr SUV
			Difference
Wheelbase	120.2 in	105.1 in	15.1 in
Length	198.4 in	174.8 in	23.6 in
Width	75.0 in	71.7 in	3.3 in
Height	58.2 in	63.5 in	-5.3 in
Curb Weight	3934 lb.	3660 lb.	274 lb.
Fuel Capacity	18.5 gal.	16.1 gal.	2.4 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	38.6 in	42.0 in	-3.4 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	59.5 in	56.7 in	2.8 in
Hip Room, Row 1	56.2 in	0.0 in	56.2 in
Legroom, Row 1	41.8 in	40.4 in	1.4 in
Headroom, Row 2	36.6 in	39.4 in	-2.8 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	57.9 in	57.2 in	0.7 in
Hip Room, Row 2	56.1 in	0.0 in	56.1 in
Legroom, Row 2	40.1 in	37.0 in	3.1 in
Total Legroom	81.9 in (over 2 rows)	77.4 in (over 2 rows)	4.5 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	16.1 ft³	27.1 ft³	-11 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	16.1 ft³	58.7 ft³	-42.6 ft³

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Dodge Charger

2015 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Comment
2015	The Road & Track package includes some of the best front seats I've experienced. The side bolsters, though not adjustable, manage to effectively hold slender drivers in place without uncomfortably constraining far-from-slender ones. Synthetic suede center panels assist in this task. Yet as performance-oriented as these seats are, they aren't overly firm, and should prove comfortable even on day-long drives. Despite the more hardcore nature of the Chevrolet SS, its front seats have much smaller, far less effective bolsters. Some synthetic suede helps to mitigate this shortcoming, but the Dodge's buckets are much better for both comfort and support. see full Dodge Charger review

2015 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	The Dodge Charger's rear seat cushion is comfortably shaped and positioned. Rear knee room, though less abundant than the sedan's exterior dimensions might suggest, is neverless generous. So what is rear seat room doing among the reasons not to buy a Charger? Well, headroom is in short supply. People 5-11 and up could become painfully familiar with the backlight. Shorter passengers won't experience this issue, but could find the back seat uncomfortably confining because the smallish rear side windows descend only to neck level. For more rear headroom and larger rear side windows, check out the related Chrysler 300. Or the Chevrolet SS, which has 1.4 inches more rear headroom than the Charger. see full Dodge Charger review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Dodge Charger

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Dodge Charger.

Be the first!

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 BMW X1

2016 BMW X1 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Comment
2016	When the engine and transmission are mounted sideways, much more space can be allocated for passengers and cargo. Compared to the BMW X3, which has a longitudinal powertrain, the X1 is nine inches shorter (175 vs. 184), two inches narrower (72 vs. 74), and two inches lower (64 vs. 66), yet it has a little more headroom, rear shoulder room, and legroom. A funny thing: according to the official specs, the 2013-2015 X1 had only an inch less combined legroom than the new one. The difference feels much greater. It helps that the seats are mounted higher in the new X1. Even the largest feet can fit beneath the front seats at a comfortable angle. Want to tap your toes while riding in back? Go for it, there's plenty of space under there--a rarity among upscale cars. This combined with the relatively high rear seat cushion means that the average adult (e.g. 5-9 me) enjoys sufficient thigh support, which is often lacking in much larger crossovers. When all the way back, a $300 sliding and reclining second-row seat adds another inch of rear legroom. Though worthwhile overall, its seat backs return to a fully vertical position after being folded. Each of its three sections must then be reset one by one at a comfortable angle, a nuisance. The Audi Q3's rear seat is far tighter. The spec sheet suggests a mere 31 inches of rear legroom, a considerable half-foot less than in the new X1. In reality the Audi's rear seat doesn't seem quite that tight. I can sit behind myself with at most two inches of knee room to spare, vs. about five in the BMW. Still, with a tall driver the Q3's rear legroom would becomes essentially zero. The Lincoln MKC's rear seat isn't much roomier than the Audi's, while the Lexus NX has about as much rear knee room as the BMW but a lower seat cushion and less foot room beneath its front seats. Though the new Mini Clubman shares both the new UKL platform and a 105-inch wheelbase with the 2016 X1, its roof is seven inches lower, a big difference, and its seats are mounted lower than those in the average car, much less a crossover. There's perhaps an inch more knee room than in the Audi. The next Mini Countryman should be close in size to the X1. see full BMW X1 review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 BMW X1

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 BMW X1.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans

See TrueDelta's information for all Dodge models.