Dodge Charger (2016) vs. Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2016 Dodge Charger and 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban specs.
2016 Dodge Charger and 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications
Model Year |
2016 |
2016 |
|
Model |
Dodge Charger |
Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr Sedan |
4dr SUV |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
120.2 in |
116.0 in |
4.2 in |
Length |
198.4 in |
204.0 in |
-5.6 in |
Width |
75.0 in |
80.5 in |
-5.5 in |
Height |
58.2 in |
74.4 in |
-16.2 in |
Curb Weight |
3934 lb. |
5466 lb. |
-1532 lb. |
Fuel Capacity |
18.5 gal. |
26.0 gal. |
-7.5 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 |
38.6 in |
42.8 in |
-4.2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
59.5 in |
64.8 in |
-5.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
56.2 in |
60.8 in |
-4.6 in |
Legroom, Row 1 |
41.8 in |
45.3 in |
-3.5 in |
Headroom, Row 2 |
36.6 in |
38.7 in |
-2.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
57.9 in |
65.1 in |
-7.2 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
56.1 in |
60.3 in |
-4.2 in |
Legroom, Row 2 |
40.1 in |
39.0 in |
1.1 in |
Headroom, Row 3 |
0.0 in |
38.1 in |
-38.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
0.0 in |
62.6 in |
-62.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 |
0.0 in |
49.3 in |
-49.3 in |
Legroom, Row 3 |
0.0 in |
24.8 in |
-24.8 in |
Total Legroom |
81.9 in (over 2 rows) |
109.1 in (over 3 rows) |
-27.2 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
16.1 ft3 |
15.3 ft3 |
0.8 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
16.1 |
51.6 ft3 |
-35.5 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
16.1 ft3 |
94.7 ft3 |
-78.6 ft3 |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger
2015 |
The Road & Track package includes some of the best front seats I've experienced. The side bolsters, though not adjustable, manage to effectively hold slender drivers in place without uncomfortably constraining far-from-slender ones. Synthetic suede center panels assist in this task. Yet as performance-oriented as these seats are, they aren't overly firm, and should prove comfortable even on day-long drives.
Despite the more hardcore nature of the Chevrolet SS, its front seats have much smaller, far less effective bolsters. Some synthetic suede helps to mitigate this shortcoming, but the Dodge's buckets are much better for both comfort and support.
see full Dodge Charger review |
2016 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
The Dodge Charger's rear seat cushion is comfortably shaped and positioned. Rear knee room, though less abundant than the sedan's exterior dimensions might suggest, is neverless generous. So what is rear seat room doing among the reasons not to buy a Charger?
Well, headroom is in short supply. People 5-11 and up could become painfully familiar with the backlight. Shorter passengers won't experience this issue, but could find the back seat uncomfortably confining because the smallish rear side windows descend only to neck level. For more rear headroom and larger rear side windows, check out the related Chrysler 300. Or the Chevrolet SS, which has 1.4 inches more rear headroom than the Charger.
see full Dodge Charger review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger.
Be the first!
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
2015 |
Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive.
The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste.
see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition).
Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it.
In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result.
The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's.
see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all
Dodge models.