| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Dodge Charger and 2019 Ford Explorer Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2019 | |
| Model | Dodge Charger | Ford Explorer | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,053 mm | 2,860 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,039 mm | 5,037 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,905 mm | 2,004 mm | -1 mm |
| Height | 1,478 mm | 1,778 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,784 kg | 2,022 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 70 L | 70 L | 0 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 1,052 mm | 979 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,511 mm | 1,562 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,427 mm | 1,455 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,031 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 930 mm | 1,031 mm | 929 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,471 mm | 1,549 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,425 mm | 1,443 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,019 mm | 1,003 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 960 mm | -960 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,290 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,034 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 846 mm | -846 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,080 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,880 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 456 L | 595 L | -139 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 16.1 | 1,243 L | 15.1 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 16.1 | 2,313 L | 14.1 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger
| 2016 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The Road & Track package includes some of the best front seats I've experienced. The side bolsters, though not adjustable, manage to effectively hold slender drivers in place without uncomfortably constraining far-from-slender ones. Synthetic suede center panels assist in this task. Yet as performance-oriented as these seats are, they aren't overly firm, and should prove comfortable even on day-long drives. Despite the more hardcore nature of the Chevrolet SS, its front seats have much smaller, far less effective bolsters. Some synthetic suede helps to mitigate this shortcoming, but the Dodge's buckets are much better for both comfort and support. see full Dodge Charger review | |
| 2016 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Dodge Charger's rear seat cushion is comfortably shaped and positioned. Rear knee room, though less abundant than the sedan's exterior dimensions might suggest, is neverless generous. So what is rear seat room doing among the reasons not to buy a Charger? Well, headroom is in short supply. People 5-11 and up could become painfully familiar with the backlight. Shorter passengers won't experience this issue, but could find the back seat uncomfortably confining because the smallish rear side windows descend only to neck level. For more rear headroom and larger rear side windows, check out the related Chrysler 300. Or the Chevrolet SS, which has 1.4 inches more rear headroom than the Charger. see full Dodge Charger review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 Ford Explorer
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Ford Explorer.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Dodge models.
