| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Dodge Charger and 2003 Ford Taurus Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2003 | |
| Model | Dodge Charger | Ford Taurus | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Dodge Charger
| 2014 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The Road & Track package includes some of the best front seats I've experienced. The side bolsters, though not adjustable, manage to effectively hold slender drivers in place without uncomfortably constraining far-from-slender ones. Synthetic suede center panels assist in this task. Yet as performance-oriented as these seats are, they aren't overly firm, and should prove comfortable even on day-long drives. Despite the more hardcore nature of the Chevrolet SS, its front seats have much smaller, far less effective bolsters. Some synthetic suede helps to mitigate this shortcoming, but the Dodge's buckets are much better for both comfort and support. see full Dodge Charger review | |
| 2014 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Dodge Charger's rear seat cushion is comfortably shaped and positioned. Rear knee room, though less abundant than the sedan's exterior dimensions might suggest, is neverless generous. So what is rear seat room doing among the reasons not to buy a Charger? Well, headroom is in short supply. People 5-11 and up could become painfully familiar with the backlight. Shorter passengers won't experience this issue, but could find the back seat uncomfortably confining because the smallish rear side windows descend only to neck level. For more rear headroom and larger rear side windows, check out the related Chrysler 300. Or the Chevrolet SS, which has 1.4 inches more rear headroom than the Charger. see full Dodge Charger review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Dodge Charger
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Dodge Charger.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Taurus
| 2003 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2004 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Big and cavernous, would hold three adults easily! see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2004 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
There is room, but not so much room that I feel lost (as in the newer Taurus-former 500). see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2002 | 4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Interior has tons of space for a car, nuff said. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2002 | 4dr Wagon 200-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Very comfortable with adjustable lumbar for driver. Can sit up high for good visibility. Ride in great comfort on long trips in these seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2003 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2002 | 4dr Wagon 200-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
No rear head rests. Plain design is just not as comfortable as the fronts. see full Ford Taurus review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Dodge models.
