Dodge Charger (2015) vs. Ford Taurus (2012) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2015 Dodge Charger and 2012 Ford Taurus specs.
2015 Dodge Charger and 2012 Ford Taurus Specifications
Model Year |
2015 |
2012 |
|
Model |
Dodge Charger |
Ford Taurus |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr Sedan |
4dr Sedan |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
3,053 mm |
2,868 mm |
1 mm |
Length |
5,039 mm |
5,154 mm |
0 mm |
Width |
1,905 mm |
1,935 mm |
0 mm |
Height |
1,478 mm |
1,542 mm |
0 mm |
Curb Weight |
1,784 kg |
1,821 kg |
0 kg |
Fuel Capacity |
70 L |
76 L |
-6 L |
Headroom, Row 1 |
980 mm |
991 mm |
-11 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,511 mm |
1,471 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,427 mm |
1,430 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 |
1,062 mm |
1,064 mm |
0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 |
930 mm |
960 mm |
-30 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,471 mm |
1,445 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,425 mm |
1,417 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 |
1,019 mm |
968 mm |
-967 mm |
Total Legroom |
2,080 mm (over 2 rows) |
2,032 mm (over 2 rows) |
0 mm |
Cargo Volume |
456 L |
569 L |
-113 L |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Dodge Charger
2015 |
The Road & Track package includes some of the best front seats I've experienced. The side bolsters, though not adjustable, manage to effectively hold slender drivers in place without uncomfortably constraining far-from-slender ones. Synthetic suede center panels assist in this task. Yet as performance-oriented as these seats are, they aren't overly firm, and should prove comfortable even on day-long drives.
Despite the more hardcore nature of the Chevrolet SS, its front seats have much smaller, far less effective bolsters. Some synthetic suede helps to mitigate this shortcoming, but the Dodge's buckets are much better for both comfort and support.
see full Dodge Charger review |
2015 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
The Dodge Charger's rear seat cushion is comfortably shaped and positioned. Rear knee room, though less abundant than the sedan's exterior dimensions might suggest, is neverless generous. So what is rear seat room doing among the reasons not to buy a Charger?
Well, headroom is in short supply. People 5-11 and up could become painfully familiar with the backlight. Shorter passengers won't experience this issue, but could find the back seat uncomfortably confining because the smallish rear side windows descend only to neck level. For more rear headroom and larger rear side windows, check out the related Chrysler 300. Or the Chevrolet SS, which has 1.4 inches more rear headroom than the Charger.
see full Dodge Charger review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Dodge Charger
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Dodge Charger.
Be the first!
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Taurus
2011 |
4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Three adult room in the back seat - comfortably!
see full Ford Taurus review |
2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 |
0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car.
see full Ford Taurus review |
2012 |
0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats.
see full Ford Taurus review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all
Dodge models.