Dodge Charger (2015) vs. GMC Terrain (2019) Specs

vs.

◆

2015 Dodge Charger and 2019 GMC Terrain Specifications

Model Year	2015	2019
Model	Dodge Charger	GMC Terrain
Engine
Transmission
Drivetrain
Body	4dr Sedan	4dr SUV
			Difference
Wheelbase	120.2 in	107.3 in	12.9 in
Length	198.4 in	182.3 in	16.1 in
Width	75.0 in	72.4 in	2.6 in
Height	58.2 in	65.4 in	-7.2 in
Curb Weight	3934 lb.	3449 lb.	485 lb.
Fuel Capacity	18.5 gal.	14.9 gal.	3.6 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	38.6 in	40.0 in	-1.4 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	59.5 in	57.2 in	2.3 in
Hip Room, Row 1	56.2 in	54.4 in	1.8 in
Legroom, Row 1	41.8 in	40.9 in	0.9 in
Headroom, Row 2	36.6 in	38.5 in	-1.9 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	57.9 in	55.6 in	2.3 in
Hip Room, Row 2	56.1 in	51.8 in	4.3 in
Legroom, Row 2	40.1 in	39.7 in	0.4 in
Total Legroom	81.9 in (over 2 rows)	80.6 in (over 2 rows)	1.3 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	16.1 ft³	29.6 ft³	-13.5 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	16.1 ft³	63.3 ft³	-47.2 ft³

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Dodge Charger

2015 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Comment
2015	The Road & Track package includes some of the best front seats I've experienced. The side bolsters, though not adjustable, manage to effectively hold slender drivers in place without uncomfortably constraining far-from-slender ones. Synthetic suede center panels assist in this task. Yet as performance-oriented as these seats are, they aren't overly firm, and should prove comfortable even on day-long drives. Despite the more hardcore nature of the Chevrolet SS, its front seats have much smaller, far less effective bolsters. Some synthetic suede helps to mitigate this shortcoming, but the Dodge's buckets are much better for both comfort and support. see full Dodge Charger review

2015 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	The Dodge Charger's rear seat cushion is comfortably shaped and positioned. Rear knee room, though less abundant than the sedan's exterior dimensions might suggest, is neverless generous. So what is rear seat room doing among the reasons not to buy a Charger? Well, headroom is in short supply. People 5-11 and up could become painfully familiar with the backlight. Shorter passengers won't experience this issue, but could find the back seat uncomfortably confining because the smallish rear side windows descend only to neck level. For more rear headroom and larger rear side windows, check out the related Chrysler 300. Or the Chevrolet SS, which has 1.4 inches more rear headroom than the Charger. see full Dodge Charger review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Dodge Charger

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Dodge Charger.

Be the first!

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain

2019 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Comment
2018	The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans

See TrueDelta's information for all Dodge models.