| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Dodge Charger and 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2004 | |
| Model | Dodge Charger | Mercury Grand Marquis | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger
| 2016 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The Road & Track package includes some of the best front seats I've experienced. The side bolsters, though not adjustable, manage to effectively hold slender drivers in place without uncomfortably constraining far-from-slender ones. Synthetic suede center panels assist in this task. Yet as performance-oriented as these seats are, they aren't overly firm, and should prove comfortable even on day-long drives. Despite the more hardcore nature of the Chevrolet SS, its front seats have much smaller, far less effective bolsters. Some synthetic suede helps to mitigate this shortcoming, but the Dodge's buckets are much better for both comfort and support. see full Dodge Charger review | |
| 2016 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Dodge Charger's rear seat cushion is comfortably shaped and positioned. Rear knee room, though less abundant than the sedan's exterior dimensions might suggest, is neverless generous. So what is rear seat room doing among the reasons not to buy a Charger? Well, headroom is in short supply. People 5-11 and up could become painfully familiar with the backlight. Shorter passengers won't experience this issue, but could find the back seat uncomfortably confining because the smallish rear side windows descend only to neck level. For more rear headroom and larger rear side windows, check out the related Chrysler 300. Or the Chevrolet SS, which has 1.4 inches more rear headroom than the Charger. see full Dodge Charger review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis
| 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
The bench seats are all day comfortable. see full Mercury Grand Marquis review |
| 2005 | 4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
Pretty good rear seat space, and it will fit six people. But the center passengers had better be small. Still, the bench seats are very handy. see full Mercury Grand Marquis review |
| 2004 | 4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
I have a family of six, and in a pinch this car can carry all of us. see full Mercury Grand Marquis review |
| 2003 | 4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
Wanted lots of room. Liked pushbutton pedals positioning, so I can move the front seat forward to increase rear seat room. Front seats are way rearward for safety otherwise. see full Mercury Grand Marquis review |
| 2003 | 4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
Roomy only by positioning the front seats farther forward, but it is possible to make room for rear passengers. see full Mercury Grand Marquis review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Dodge models.
