Dodge Charger (2010) vs. Toyota Prius (2015) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2010 Dodge Charger and 2015 Toyota Prius specs.
2010 Dodge Charger and 2015 Toyota Prius Specifications
| Model Year |
2010 |
2015 |
|
| Model |
Dodge Charger |
Toyota Prius |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
4dr Sedan |
4dr Hatch |
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Wheelbase |
3,048 mm |
2,700 mm |
1 mm |
| Length |
5,083 mm |
4,481 mm |
1 mm |
| Width |
1,892 mm |
1,745 mm |
0 mm |
| Height |
1,478 mm |
1,491 mm |
0 mm |
| Curb Weight |
1,724 kg |
1,380 kg |
0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity |
68 L |
45 L |
23 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 |
983 mm |
980 mm |
3 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,506 mm |
1,394 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,427 mm |
1,339 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 |
1,062 mm |
1,080 mm |
0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 |
919 mm |
955 mm |
-36 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,463 mm |
1,349 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,427 mm |
1,300 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 |
1,021 mm |
914 mm |
-913 mm |
| Total Legroom |
2,083 mm (over 2 rows) |
1,994 mm (over 2 rows) |
1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum |
459 L |
612 L |
-153 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum |
16.2 |
1,121 L |
15.2 |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Dodge Charger
| 2010 |
4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
4-speed automatic RWD |
I previously owned a crossover vehicle and this car has much more leg room.
see full Dodge Charger review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Toyota Prius
| 2016 |
For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan.
The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable.
The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia.
Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX.
see full Toyota Prius review |
| 2015 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited.
Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility.
see full Toyota Prius review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Toyota Prius.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
SedansSee TrueDelta's information for all
Dodge models.
