Model Year | 2015 | 2017 | |
Model | Dodge Grand Caravan | Toyota Prius | |
Engine | 3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 283 hp@6400 260 lb-ft@4400 |
1.8L I4 Hybrid DOHC-4v 95 hp@5200 105 lb-ft@3600 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | CVT | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,078 mm | 2,700 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,144 mm | 4,539 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,999 mm | 1,760 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,725 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,046 kg | 1,395 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 43 L | 33 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,011 mm | 1,001 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,618 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,483 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,034 mm | 1,097 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 950 mm | 48 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,628 mm | 1,346 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,651 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 927 mm | 848 mm | 79 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 963 mm | 0 mm | 963 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,575 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,237 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 831 mm | 0 mm | 831 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,791 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,946 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 934 L | 697 L | 237 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,359 L | 24.6 | -22.6 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 4,072 L | 1,775 L | 3 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Dodge Grand Caravan.
2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review |
2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius.