Dodge Journey (2015) vs. Chevrolet SS (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2015 Dodge Journey and 2016 Chevrolet SS specs.
2015 Dodge Journey and 2016 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year |
2015 |
2016 |
|
| Model |
Dodge Journey |
Chevrolet SS |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr Sedan |
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Wheelbase |
2,891 mm |
2,916 mm |
0 mm |
| Length |
4,887 mm |
4,966 mm |
0 mm |
| Width |
1,834 mm |
1,897 mm |
0 mm |
| Height |
1,692 mm |
1,471 mm |
0 mm |
| Curb Weight |
1,721 kg |
1,813 kg |
0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity |
78 L |
71 L |
7 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 |
1,036 mm |
983 mm |
-982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,461 mm |
1,501 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,367 mm |
1,453 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 |
1,036 mm |
1,074 mm |
0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 |
1,013 mm |
965 mm |
-964 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,445 mm |
1,499 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,382 mm |
1,473 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 |
853 mm |
1,008 mm |
852 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 |
958 mm |
0 mm |
958 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
1,105 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 |
1,016 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 |
594 mm |
0 mm |
594 mm |
| Total Legroom |
2,484 mm (over 3 rows) |
2,083 mm (over 2 rows) |
0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum |
303 L |
464 L |
-161 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
1,048 L |
16.4 |
-15.4 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum |
1,914 L |
16.4 |
-15.4 L |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Dodge Journey
| 2015 |
0 |
I love the driver's seat -- it's supportive, comfortable and cushy. I like the power lumbar feature on the SXT that lets you position it up/down and larger/smaller. Not so big on the manual recline with the power seat -- adjustments to the seat bottom don't move the seatback.
see full Dodge Journey review |
| 2015 Dodge Journey Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2015 |
0 |
This is NOT a vehicle for a family of six. There were nonstop complaints about legroom from all my kids -- the 8-year-old twins in the wayback, the teenagers in the middle row. I couldn't be comfortable in the driver's seat, so that my son could have enough room to actually sit straight in the middle row, while giving his little sister enough room for her feet in the back row. It's a "make-do" or "in a pinch" 6-passenger car. Across town with 6 people is okay, across the state would incite a riot and mutiny.
see full Dodge Journey review |
| 2014 |
4dr SUV 283-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I normally take customers to lunch and is not easy to accommodate 4 mid-size adults in the Journey, not mention 5. This Journey comes equipped with a third row that is supposed to accommodate 2 more persons, but the space is extremely small and I would not recommend having someone sitting there for a long trip.
see full Dodge Journey review |
| 2014 |
4dr SUV 283-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
When I received my Journey the driver seat was comfortable but as I started traveling extensible the seat become more and more uncomfortable. I thought it was just me but other coworkers driving Journey report the same issue while the ones driving the Chevy Equinox and Ford Fusion state that the seats in their vehicles remain comfortable. Up to now, I can?t drive more than 2 hours without stopping somewhere to stretch my back.
see full Dodge Journey review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2015 |
Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat.
Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVsSee TrueDelta's information for all
Dodge models.
