MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Dodge Neon vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Chart is based on 86 fuel economy reports for the Dodge Neon and 90 fuel economy reports for the Mitsubishi Lancer.

Dodge Neon L/100km

Dodge Neon Dodge Neon 2005 8.1 MPG Highway Percentage 58 percent Dodge Neon Dodge Neon 2004 10.5 MPG Highway Percentage 31 percent Dodge Neon Dodge Neon 2004 7.1 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Dodge Neon Dodge Neon 2004 7.2 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Dodge Neon Dodge Neon 2004 8.8 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Dodge Neon Dodge Neon 2003 7.8 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Dodge Neon Dodge Neon 2003 7.4 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Dodge Neon Dodge Neon 2000 8.4 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd L/100km
2005 4dr Sedan 132-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light light 9 20 13 58 86 8.1  
2004 4dr Sedan 230-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 8 20 41 31 75 10.5  
2004 4dr Sedan 150-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light hvy 10 20 10 60 60 7.1  
2004 4dr Sedan 132-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light light 0 15 25 60 58 7.2  
2004 4dr Sedan 132-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med none 0 80 10 10 60 8.8  
2003 4dr Sedan 132-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 hills med light 8 43 21 30 65 7.8  
2003 4dr Sedan 132-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light light 0 10 20 70 60 7.4  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2000 4dr Sedan 132-horsepower 2.0L I4
3-speed automatic FWD		 flat light light 18 25 48 10 65 8.4  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Dodge Neon fuel economy data.

Mitsubishi Lancer L/100km

Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2014 11.1 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 12.4 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 11.4 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 8.1 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 8.9 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 11.8 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 11.1 MPG Highway Percentage 16 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 9.3 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 7.5 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 9.3 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 8.5 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 10.1 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 9.5 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 8.1 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 8.5 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 7.9 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 11.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 8.1 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 9.4 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 7.3 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 10.9 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 10.2 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 9.4 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 7.0 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 11.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 10.7 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 10.6 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 10.0 MPG Highway Percentage 88 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 8.7 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 9.0 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 8.3 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd L/100km
2014 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat med none 0 0 60 40 65 11.1  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med hvy 15 0 10 75 70 12.4  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med none 30 5 5 60 75 11.4  
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med light 5 20 10 65 63 8.1  
2011 4dr Hatch 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med light 25 20 25 30 75 8.9  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med none 5 15 40 40 75 11.8  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med light 19 16 49 16 110 11.1  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med none 10 21 36 33 67 9.3  
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 10 10 0 80 100 7.5  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med light 0 3 38 59 70 9.3  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 hills med none 6 12 41 41 120 8.5  
2009 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med light 6 6 34 55 70 10.1  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat lead none 14 21 22 43 76 9.5  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 10 21 23 45 88 8.1  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 flat light hvy 20 50 30 0 0 8.5  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 7 17 1 75 103 7.9  
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat med light 7 20 33 40 83 11.2  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 hills med none 10 21 14 56 80 8.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat light none 7 24 10 59 86 9.4  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 0 0 20 80 70 7.3  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD		 flat med none 19 8 23 50 74 10.9  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat light none 5 28 5 63 60 10.2  
2006 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med none 16 16 12 57 79 9.4  
2006 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light hvy 0 20 0 80 70 7.0  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD		 flat light none 15 5 40 40 60 11.2  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat lead none 5 0 0 95 60 10.7  
2005 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 5 10 10 75 100 10.6  
2003 4dr Sedan turbocharged 271hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat med light 1 4 8 88 70 10.0  
2003 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 0 25 0 75 65 8.7  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 7 19 37 37 55 9.0  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light light 18 13 25 45 65 8.3  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mitsubishi Lancer fuel economy data.

Dodge Neon vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Dodge Neon and Mitsubishi Lancer's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world L/100km based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Dodge models and Mitsubishi models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Dodge Neon

Dodge Neon Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2005 4dr Sedan 132-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 Good mileage but still peppy engine. see full Dodge Neon review
2004 4dr Sedan 132-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 mpg consistently in the mid/high 30s see full Dodge Neon review
2003 4dr Sedan 132-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 Excellent. Getting 25 mpg in town. Perfect for a school car that never gets out on the road. see full Dodge Neon review
2003 4dr Sedan 132-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 Good fuel efficiency for its size; 32 mpg highway. see full Dodge Neon review
2002 4dr Sedan 132-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 33mpg around town and 40-42 mph on highway see full Dodge Neon review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
Mitsubishi did improve the powertrain's EPA ratings a few years ago. But they're still only 22 mpg city, 31 highway. Even the portly Dart GT manages 23/33 with a manual transmission. Credit a sixth ratio the Lancer lacks. In my suburban driving, the trip computer regularly reported averages in the high 20s. Other compacts have done better in the same driving, but not by as wide a margin as the EPA numbers would suggest. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 I am getting consistent 27-29 MPG on mid-west (flat) back county roads during my commute. I am getting 32 MPG on the highway. My driving style is moderately spirited. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 Uses regular gas and gets about 30 mpg. My Civic SI was getting about the same but used premium. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 Very good millage/power ratio see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 The car gets average fuel economy in its class, coming in at about 22 mpg city, 30 mpg highway, but it is well above most cars. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 It's not as great as you'd expect from an econobox. If this is your biggest concern, this is not the car for you. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 17 mpg in 2.4 litter my altima that is 2.5 litter i get 23 same driving conditions hmm bigger engin better gas if it always worked out this way i would buy a bmw 335 xdrive see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 22-24 avarage MPG see full Mitsubishi Lancer review