Ford Bronco Sport (2021) vs. Chevrolet SS (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2021 Ford Bronco Sport and 2016 Chevrolet SS specs.
2021 Ford Bronco Sport and 2016 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year |
2021 |
2016 |
|
| Model |
Ford Bronco Sport |
Chevrolet SS |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr Sedan |
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Wheelbase |
2,670 mm |
2,916 mm |
0 mm |
| Length |
4,387 mm |
4,966 mm |
0 mm |
| Width |
1,887 mm |
1,897 mm |
0 mm |
| Height |
1,783 mm |
1,471 mm |
0 mm |
| Curb Weight |
1,573 kg |
1,813 kg |
0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity |
61 L |
71 L |
-10 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 |
1,054 mm |
983 mm |
-982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,455 mm |
1,501 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,402 mm |
1,453 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 |
1,036 mm |
1,074 mm |
0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 |
1,059 mm |
965 mm |
-964 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,412 mm |
1,499 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,356 mm |
1,473 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 |
937 mm |
1,008 mm |
936 mm |
| Total Legroom |
1,974 mm (over 2 rows) |
2,083 mm (over 2 rows) |
-1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum |
920 L |
464 L |
456 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum |
1,846 L |
16.4 |
-15.4 L |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2021 Ford Bronco Sport
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2021 Ford Bronco Sport.
Be the first!
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2015 |
Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat.
Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVsSee TrueDelta's information for all
Ford models.
