| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Ford C-MAX and 2018 GMC Terrain Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2018 | |
| Model | Ford C-MAX | GMC Terrain | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,649 mm | 2,725 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,409 mm | 4,630 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,829 mm | 1,839 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,623 mm | 1,661 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,636 kg | 1,564 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 51 L | 56 L | -5 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,016 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,420 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,379 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 978 mm | -977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,402 mm | 1,412 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,318 mm | 1,316 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 927 mm | 1,008 mm | 926 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 694 L | 838 L | -144 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,489 L | 1,792 L | 0 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX
| 2013 Ford C-MAX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's plenty of space for adults in the back seat of the C-MAX. But the seat is mounted too low to provide thigh support, and between this and the angle of the floor I could find no comfortable way to position my legs and feet. There's a huge amount of headroom, so this was not the limiting factor. Instead, the seat seems to be so low to enable a flat floor when it is folded without requiring that the seat bottom be folded separately from the seat back. Combine the low seat with a high beltline (bottom of the side windows), and children can't see out well. see full Ford C-MAX review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain
| 2018 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2018 | The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
