Model Year | 2013 | 2007 | |
Model | Ford C-MAX | Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Hatch | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 104.3 in | 106.9 in | -2.6 in |
Length | 173.6 in | 183.2 in | -9.6 in |
Width | 72.0 in | 68.5 in | 3.5 in |
Height | 63.9 in | 55.4 in | 8.5 in |
Curb Weight | 3607 lb. | 3585 lb. | 22 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 13.5 gal. | 16.4 gal. | -2.9 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 41.0 in | 37.1 in | 3.9 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.9 in | 53.2 in | 2.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.3 in | 53.7 in | 0.6 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 42.0 in | -1.6 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.4 in | 35.8 in | 3.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.2 in | 49.3 in | 5.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 51.9 in | 45.9 in | 6 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 36.5 in | 33.0 in | 3.5 in |
Total Legroom | 76.9 in (over 2 rows) | 75 in (over 2 rows) | 1.9 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 24.5 ft3 | 10.4 ft3 | 14.1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 52.6 ft3 | 10.4 ft3 | 42.2 ft3 |
2013 Ford C-MAX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
There's plenty of space for adults in the back seat of the C-MAX. But the seat is mounted too low to provide thigh support, and between this and the angle of the floor I could find no comfortable way to position my legs and feet. There's a huge amount of headroom, so this was not the limiting factor. Instead, the seat seems to be so low to enable a flat floor when it is folded without requiring that the seat bottom be folded separately from the seat back. Combine the low seat with a high beltline (bottom of the side windows), and children can't see out well. see full Ford C-MAX review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK.