Model Year | 2013 | 2020 | |
Model | Ford C-MAX | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,649 mm | 2,670 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,409 mm | 4,694 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,829 mm | 1,811 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,623 mm | 1,709 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,636 kg | 1,520 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 51 L | 63 L | -12 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,031 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,420 mm | 1,438 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,379 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 975 mm | -974 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,402 mm | 1,425 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,318 mm | 1,313 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 927 mm | 947 mm | -20 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 907 mm | -907 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,306 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,001 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 716 mm | -716 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,703 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 694 L | 292 L | 402 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 24.5 | 968 L | -943.5 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,489 L | 1,792 L | 0 L |
2013 Ford C-MAX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
There's plenty of space for adults in the back seat of the C-MAX. But the seat is mounted too low to provide thigh support, and between this and the angle of the floor I could find no comfortable way to position my legs and feet. There's a huge amount of headroom, so this was not the limiting factor. Instead, the seat seems to be so low to enable a flat floor when it is folded without requiring that the seat bottom be folded separately from the seat back. Combine the low seat with a high beltline (bottom of the side windows), and children can't see out well. see full Ford C-MAX review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Mitsubishi Outlander.