Model Year | 2017 | 2016 | |
Model | Ford C-MAX | Nissan Murano | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,649 mm | 2,824 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,409 mm | 4,897 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,829 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,623 mm | 1,692 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,651 kg | 1,719 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 51 L | 72 L | -21 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,013 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,420 mm | 1,514 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,379 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,107 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,402 mm | 1,494 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,318 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 927 mm | 983 mm | -56 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,090 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 694 L | 1,121 L | 693 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,489 L | 1,979 L | 0 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Ford C-MAX.
2016 Nissan Murano Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | I nearly ranked the new Nissan Murano's front seats ahead of its styling as reasons to buy one. With form-fitting contours and cushy-yet-supportive construction "inspired by NASA," they're that good. I wasn't able to drive the Murano all day, but felt like I easily could have. The 2015 Ford Edge's driver seat didn't initially strike me as especially comfortable. It felt flatter and less luxurious than that in the Nissan. But over the course of my test drive it seemed to fit and support me better and better. By the end it seemed very comfortable, yet still not quite as good as the Nissan's. The Edge Titanium's seats have a sportier appearance and shape than the SEL's, and might provide more lateral support. see full Nissan Murano review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Nissan Murano.