

Model Year | 2013 | 2013 | |
Model | Ford C-MAX | Toyota Matrix | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,649 mm | 2,601 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,409 mm | 4,366 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,829 mm | 1,765 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,623 mm | 1,560 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,636 kg | 1,300 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 51 L | 50 L | 1 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,420 mm | 1,354 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,379 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 998 mm | -997 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,402 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,318 mm | 1,110 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 927 mm | 919 mm | 8 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,976 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 694 L | 561 L | 133 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,489 L | 1,741 L | 0 L |
2013 Ford C-MAX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
There's plenty of space for adults in the back seat of the C-MAX. But the seat is mounted too low to provide thigh support, and between this and the angle of the floor I could find no comfortable way to position my legs and feet. There's a huge amount of headroom, so this was not the limiting factor. Instead, the seat seems to be so low to enable a flat floor when it is folded without requiring that the seat bottom be folded separately from the seat back. Combine the low seat with a high beltline (bottom of the side windows), and children can't see out well. see full Ford C-MAX review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Toyota Matrix.