| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Ford Edge and 2016 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2016 | |
| Model | Ford Edge | Chevrolet SS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,824 mm | 2,916 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,717 mm | 4,966 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,925 mm | 1,897 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,707 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,848 kg | 1,813 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 71 L | 1 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,016 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,496 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,392 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,034 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 965 mm | 33 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,494 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,040 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 909 L | 464 L | 445 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,971 L | 16.4 | -15.4 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Ford Edge
| 2009 Ford Edge Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
i have 2 teenagers who have complained regularly with other vehicles they have rode in in the last 6 months. see full Ford Edge review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
Spacious legroom and reclining seats. Fat center fold down armrest with cup holders and adjustable A/C vents are a nice touch. see full Ford Edge review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
Great for long trips. see full Ford Edge review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
Seats are very comfortable. Love the forward leaning front headrests. Great legroom as well. see full Ford Edge review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
Larger and more comfortable than any other offering in this segment. Class leading legroom and open feel. see full Ford Edge review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic AWD |
EXCELLENT ROOM IN THE REAR FOR LEGS AND STRETCHING OUT. see full Ford Edge review |
| 2009 Ford Edge Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
A little cramped see full Ford Edge review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
not much leg room see full Ford Edge review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
