| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Ford Escape and 2016 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2016 | |
| Model | Ford Escape | Chevrolet SS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,621 mm | 2,916 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,442 mm | 4,966 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,781 mm | 1,897 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,770 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,432 kg | 1,813 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 62 L | 71 L | -9 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,351 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 996 mm | 965 mm | 31 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,420 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,247 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 904 mm | 1,008 mm | 903 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,961 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 830 L | 464 L | 366 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,877 L | 16.4 | -15.4 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford Escape
| 2006 Ford Escape Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 133-horsepower 2.3L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
Roomy. see full Ford Escape review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 153-horsepower 2.3L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I was able to put an adult and my two small children in car seats in the rear. I have been able to take my family of four, with luggage, on road trips. see full Ford Escape review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 200-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic AWD |
Leather heated seat is supportive on a longer drive. see full Ford Escape review |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 200-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic AWD |
this is very important, i have three teenagers. see full Ford Escape review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
