| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Ford Escape and 2015 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2015 | |
| Model | Ford Escape | Chevrolet SS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,619 mm | 2,916 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,437 mm | 4,966 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,806 mm | 1,897 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,720 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,476 kg | 1,803 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 62 L | 72 L | -10 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,438 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,354 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 996 mm | 965 mm | 31 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,420 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,247 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 904 mm | 1,008 mm | 903 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,961 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 827 L | 464 L | 363 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,877 L | 16.4 | -15.4 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Escape
| 2012 Ford Escape Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Front seats are comfortable AFTER removing headrests and re-installing them backwards. see full Ford Escape review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 171-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed automatic FWD |
Wide bench seat with no humps. Middle passenger has good leg room where many other vehicles have a large hump to straddle. see full Ford Escape review |
| 2012 Ford Escape Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 171-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed automatic FWD |
It's a tad bit tight in the drivers seat. I have to postion the seat just right to avoid hitting my right knee on the center console, and I frequently hit the light switch when getting out. I'm only 5'9", so not that large of a person. see full Ford Escape review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
| 2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
