| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Ford Escape and 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2012 | |
| Model | Ford Escape | Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,690 mm | 2,916 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,524 mm | 4,821 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,839 mm | 1,938 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,684 mm | 1,763 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,594 kg | 2,028 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 L | 93 L | -36 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,013 mm | 1,016 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,422 mm | 1,488 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,392 mm | 1,448 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 998 mm | -7 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,331 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 980 mm | -45 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,961 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,004 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 971 L | 1,028 L | 970 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,920 L | 1,934 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Escape
| 2013 Ford Escape Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Front seats are comfortable AFTER removing headrests and re-installing them backwards. see full Ford Escape review |
| 2013 Ford Escape Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 171-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed automatic FWD |
It's a tad bit tight in the drivers seat. I have to postion the seat just right to avoid hitting my right knee on the center console, and I frequently hit the light switch when getting out. I'm only 5'9", so not that large of a person. see full Ford Escape review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
| 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | You can buy a BMW X5 or Porsche Cayenne with tame front seats, but not the Grand Cherokee SRT8. In the Jeep, SRT's signature buckets are standard. Large, firm bolsters provide excellent lateral support even to those of us with slender builds. Yet they're also comfortable, with enough padding to avoid park bench references. The four-way adjustable lumbar didn't do much for my back, but your experience may vary. Moving to the back seat, the Grand Cherokee's growth adds a couple of badly needed inches to legroom. With this improvement the Grand Cherokee only matches other similarly sized SUVs, so it's not a reason to buy. But rear seat legroom is no longer a reason not to buy, so it bears mentioning. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
| 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Seats are supportive and highly adjustable. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Huge rear seat leg room and reclining rear seats see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 290-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Great head room (no sunroof), excellent ergonomic design to the seat backs, and vertically adjustable lumbar support see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
| 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 360-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
They are harder than I would like. I came from an F150 with the luxury package and the seats were amazing, these sears are hard and could be improved upon by being softer. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
