| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Ford Escape and 2012 Lincoln MKZ Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2012 | |
| Model | Ford Escape | Lincoln MKZ | |
| Engine | 2.5L I4 Hybrid DOHC-4v 153 hp@6000 136 lb-ft@4500 |
2.5L I4 Hybrid DOHC-4v 156 hp@6000 136 lb-ft@2250 |
|
| Transmission | CVT | CVT | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,619 mm | 2,728 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,437 mm | 4,841 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,806 mm | 1,834 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,720 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,642 kg | 1,698 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 62 L | 66 L | -4 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,438 mm | 1,458 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,354 mm | 1,372 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 996 mm | 960 mm | 36 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,420 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,247 mm | 1,354 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 904 mm | 942 mm | -38 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,961 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,017 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 827 L | 467 L | 360 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,877 L | 16.5 | -15.5 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Ford Escape
| 2010 Ford Escape Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 171-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed automatic FWD |
Wide bench seat with no humps. Middle passenger has good leg room where many other vehicles have a large hump to straddle. see full Ford Escape review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 171-horsepower 2.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Surprisingly large back seat - roomier than the Explorer see full Ford Escape review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 171-horsepower 2.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Plenty of room - includes armrests see full Ford Escape review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Lincoln MKZ
| 2012 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Seat evaluations are highly subjective. For me, the MKZ's standard front seats are very good, but short of outstanding. Compared to the seats in the Fusion, they're more firmly contoured but have smaller side bolsters. The optional multi-contour seats might address the bolster deficit. But few people are going to drive this car in a manner that requires much lateral support. see full Lincoln MKZ review | |
| 2012 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Rear seat headroom and knee room are borderline tight in the Fusion. In the MKZ they're tighter still. Six-foot passengers might still fit, but not comfortably. Even without sufficient space for toes beneath its front seat, the Lexus ES's rear seat is far roomier. see full Lincoln MKZ review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Lincoln MKZ
| 2012 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
I love driving in luxury, and this car delivers much of it. From the cooled/heated seats to the delicious feel of the leather seating surfaces, this car offers more than adequate comfort...and it is a luxury automobile after all. I would expect no less from Lincoln. see full Lincoln MKZ review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
