Ford Escape (2013) vs. Volvo V60 (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2013 Ford Escape and 2016 Volvo V60 specs.
2013 Ford Escape and 2016 Volvo V60 Specifications
| Model Year |
2013 |
2016 |
|
| Model |
Ford Escape |
Volvo V60 |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr Wagon |
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Wheelbase |
105.9 in |
109.3 in |
-3.4 in |
| Length |
178.1 in |
182.5 in |
-4.4 in |
| Width |
72.4 in |
73.4 in |
-1 in |
| Height |
66.3 in |
58.4 in |
7.9 in |
| Curb Weight |
3515 lb. |
3527 lb. |
-12 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity |
15.1 gal. |
17.8 gal. |
-2.7 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 |
39.9 in |
38.7 in |
1.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
56.0 in |
57.0 in |
-1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 |
54.8 in |
54.9 in |
-0.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 |
40.4 in |
41.9 in |
-1.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 |
39.0 in |
37.4 in |
1.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
55.3 in |
55.2 in |
0.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 |
52.4 in |
53.5 in |
-1.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 |
36.8 in |
33.5 in |
3.3 in |
| Total Legroom |
77.2 in (over 2 rows) |
75.4 in (over 2 rows) |
1.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum |
34.3 ft3 |
15.2 ft3 |
19.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum |
67.8 ft3 |
43.8 ft3 |
24 ft3 |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Escape
| 2013 |
4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Front seats are comfortable AFTER removing headrests and re-installing them backwards.
see full Ford Escape review |
| 2013 Ford Escape Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 |
4dr SUV 171-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed automatic FWD |
It's a tad bit tight in the drivers seat. I have to postion the seat just right to avoid hitting my right knee on the center console, and I frequently hit the light switch when getting out. I'm only 5'9", so not that large of a person.
see full Ford Escape review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60
| 2015 |
The V60's interior doesn't only look comfortable. Even back in the day Volvo's cars weren't known only for safety. Many people considered their seats the best. Many still do. The V60's front seats are much cushier than those in a German car, but they are also properly supportive.
One caveat. Locate the headrest to receive top scores from the crash test dummy and it will jut too far forward for people with especially upright postures--like me. "Active headrests" that move forward if and when the car is rear-ended can sidestep this tradeoff. But the V60's active headrests do not.
The BMW's seats are much firmer, but their headrests have a fore-aft adjustment. You also sit significantly lower in the BMW, but its instrument panel isn't as deep (owing to its windshield being more upright), for a more open view forward.
Your build and impressions of either car's seats may vary.
see full Volvo V60 review |
| 2016 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
The Volvo V60's rear seat space also lags the BMW's. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a couple inches to spare, but subjectively the limited space seems even tighter than it is. The side window outline that appears sexy from the outside can seem confining from the inside. Large front seat headrests block the view forward. Behind a tall driver even adults of modest size will feel cramped, if they can fit at all.
The BMW wagon has a little less headroom but a couple more inches of much-needed knee room. Also, while the Volvo's cabin is a couple inches wider than the BMW's up front, and feels much roomier as a result, this advantage disappears in back.
see full Volvo V60 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVsSee TrueDelta's information for all
Ford models.
