Ford Expedition (2014) vs. GMC Terrain (2019) Specs

vs.

◆

2014 Ford Expedition and 2019 GMC Terrain Specifications

Model Year	2014	2019
Model	Ford Expedition	GMC Terrain
Engine
Transmission
Drivetrain
Body	4dr SUV	4dr SUV
			Difference
Wheelbase	3,023 mm	2,725 mm	1 mm
Length	5,245 mm	4,630 mm	1 mm
Width	2,002 mm	1,839 mm	1 mm
Height	1,961 mm	1,661 mm	0 mm
Curb Weight	2,530 kg	1,564 kg	1 kg
Fuel Capacity	106 L	56 L	50 L
Headroom, Row 1	1,006 mm	1,016 mm	0 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 1	1,605 mm	1,453 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 1	1,529 mm	1,382 mm	0 mm
Legroom, Row 1	1,044 mm	1,039 mm	0 mm
Headroom, Row 2	1,011 mm	978 mm	-977 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 2	1,618 mm	1,412 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 2	1,521 mm	1,316 mm	0 mm
Legroom, Row 2	993 mm	1,008 mm	992 mm
Headroom, Row 3	973 mm	0 mm	973 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 3	1,318 mm	0 mm	1 mm
Hip Room, Row 3	1,275 mm	0 mm	1 mm
Legroom, Row 3	958 mm	0 mm	958 mm
Total Legroom	2,995 mm (over 3 rows)	2,047 mm (over 2 rows)	0 mm
Cargo Volume, Minimum	527 L	838 L	-311 L
Cargo Volume, Behind R2	1,557 L	29.6	-28.6 L
Cargo Volume, Maximum	3,067 L	1,792 L	2 L

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Expedition

2014 Ford Expedition Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2014	0	The driven Limited trim had black heated and cooled front seats. The cooling was necessary in the summertime Texas heat and perfomed well - I turned them on every time I got in the car (unlike the Lexus system, that you can leave on as it is a dial, you have to activate the cooling every single time you restart the car). These thrones were comfortable for a 4 hour drive - there was more room for someone who has more girth than I. Also, adjustable pedals are a great Ford innovation that I wish more manufacturers would include. My wife (who is 11 inches shorter than me) could easily drive this beast comfortably, without sitting too close to the steering wheel. see full Ford Expedition review
2014	0	Both the second and third rows have ample room, with and without kid's car seats, for three across. The third row isn't an afterthought like in other SUVs and even 5'11" adults are happy back there. Additionally, the vents provide adequate AC in 100+ degree heat. There are plenty of easily accessible LATCH anchors if you wish (although seatbelts are generally just as easy and have a higher weight rating with car seats than the LATCH anchors). Most minivans (except the Odyssey) do not have LATCH in the center of the second row - only on the outboard - and only have LATCH in the center of the third row. The Expedition (and Odyssey) is nice because they are flexible where you can put car seats comfortably. see full Ford Expedition review

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain

2019 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Comment
2018	The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs

See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.