Ford *Explorer Sport Trac Ford *Explorer Sport Trac 2006 Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2013

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford *Explorer Sport Trac (2006) vs. Chevrolet Camaro (2013) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2006 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac and 2013 Chevrolet Camaro specs.

2006 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac and 2013 Chevrolet Camaro Specifications

Model Year 2006 2013  
Model Ford *Explorer Sport Trac Chevrolet Camaro  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac

2006 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 4dr SUT 292-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
The seats are much improved over older explorers. You can ride for 4 hours and not feel tired when you get out of the truck. I have heated leather, which I recommend. The heat is in the lumbar, as well as seat bottom. Very nice seats. see full Ford *Explorer Sport Trac review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Chevrolet Camaro

2013 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
The rear seat is small and unlike the nonconvertable does not have a center seat. see full Chevrolet Camaro review
2013 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2013 2dr Convertible 400-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
The rear seating is not meant for a Adult but a child or a set of golf clubs.. & a few complaints over the comfort.. in long drives.. any thing over a hour or more. see full Chevrolet Camaro review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all SUTs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.