| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Ford Explorer and 2016 Chevrolet Cruze Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2016 | |
| Model | Ford Explorer | Chevrolet Cruze | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,860 mm | 2,700 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,006 mm | 4,666 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 2,004 mm | 1,791 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,788 mm | 1,458 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,057 kg | 1,286 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 70 L | 52 L | 18 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,031 mm | 988 mm | -987 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,557 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,455 mm | 1,351 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,031 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,029 mm | 947 mm | -946 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,549 mm | 1,351 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,440 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 917 mm | -916 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 960 mm | 0 mm | 960 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,290 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,034 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 843 mm | 0 mm | 843 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,885 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,984 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 595 L | 419 L | 176 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,240 L | 14.8 | -13.8 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,285 L | 14.8 | -12.8 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Explorer
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford Explorer.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Cruze
| 2016 Chevrolet Cruze Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | The old Chevrolet Cruze, like the Ford Focus, had a rear seat on the tight side even by compact sedan standards. According to the specs, the new one has only gained a few tenths of legroom. But the improvement feels much larger. Chevrolet claims that rear knee room (not a standard spec) has increased by two inches, and this aligns much better with my perceptions. Some competitors, including the Honda Civic, continue to offer more rear seat space. But the new Cruze's back seat could be the most comfortable in the class for two average-sized men. With a position well above the floor, the rear seat cushion provides much better thigh support than the typical sedan, much less the typical compact sedan. The Civic has a lower rear cushion and insufficient foot space under its front seats, squandering its on-paper legroom advantage. Up front the Cruze has comfortable seats (though, like those in the Civic, without adjustable lumbar support) but shoulder room typical of a compact car. The Civic has two more inches of shoulder room and feels more like a midsize sedan in the front seat. Both cars have good driving positions with reasonably compact instrument panels. In L and LS trim, the new Cruze has a 14.9-cubic-foot trunk, nearly identical to that of the new Civic and about as large as you'll find in the class. But the LT and Premier have a compact spare tire that reduces cargo volume to 13.6 cubic feet. Still pretty good. Next year both cars will also be available as hatchbacks. see full Chevrolet Cruze review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Cruze
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Cruze.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
