| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2020 Ford Explorer and 2014 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year | 2020 | 2014 | |
| Model | Ford Explorer | Chevrolet SS | |
| Engine | turbocharged 3.0L V6 DOHC-4v 400 hp@5500 415 lb-ft@3500 |
6.2L V8 OHV-2v 415 hp@5900 415 lb-ft@4600 |
|
| Transmission | 10-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,025 mm | 2,916 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,050 mm | 4,966 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 2,004 mm | 1,897 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,775 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,132 kg | 1,803 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 72 L | -4 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,034 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,570 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,504 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,029 mm | 965 mm | -964 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,572 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,501 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,008 mm | 990 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 988 mm | 0 mm | 988 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,387 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,039 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 818 mm | 0 mm | 818 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,883 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 515 L | 464 L | 51 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,356 L | 16.4 | -15.4 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,486 L | 16.4 | -14.4 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Ford Explorer
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Ford Explorer.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS
| 2014 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2014 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
