| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2007 Ford Explorer and 2016 Chevrolet Trax Specifications
| Model Year | 2007 | 2016 | |
| Model | Ford Explorer | Chevrolet Trax | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,888 mm | 2,555 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,912 mm | 4,247 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,872 mm | 1,775 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,849 mm | 1,674 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,014 kg | 1,383 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 85 L | 53 L | 32 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,011 mm | 1,006 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,499 mm | 1,374 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,407 mm | 1,313 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,036 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 983 mm | 986 mm | -3 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,496 mm | 1,341 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,410 mm | 1,288 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 937 mm | 907 mm | 30 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 950 mm | 0 mm | 950 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,349 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,151 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 886 mm | 0 mm | 886 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,901 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,943 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 385 L | 530 L | -145 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,243 L | 18.7 | -17.7 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,370 L | 1,371 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Ford Explorer
| 2007 Ford Explorer Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
the front seat has plenty of leg room and seats hug you see full Ford Explorer review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 292-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Have driven from Maryland to Florida and back a couple of times, as well as 3-4 hours trips routinely. Seats are comfortable with no backache and don't have to stop every couple of hours due to fatigue. Could drive and be comfortable all day long. see full Ford Explorer review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Trax
| 2016 Chevrolet Trax Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's much more room inside the Trax than many people expect given its compact exterior. At 5-9, I could sit behind myself with a few inches of knee room to spare. But if the people in the front seats are taller than me, those in the back seat better be shorter. The Renegade and 500X have about the same amount of rear knee room as the Trax. They have a couple inches more shoulder room, though, so fitting three people in back is a little less of a squeeze. (It will still help if they enjoy physical contact with one another.) The Honda HR-V isn't wider, but does have a few more inches of rear legroom. On the other hand, the rear seats in the Nissan JUKE and MINI Countryman are tighter than that in the Trax. see full Chevrolet Trax review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Trax
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Trax.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
