| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Ford Explorer and 2016 Dodge Charger Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2016 | |
| Model | Ford Explorer | Dodge Charger | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,888 mm | 3,053 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,912 mm | 5,039 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,872 mm | 1,905 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,849 mm | 1,478 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,014 kg | 1,784 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 85 L | 70 L | 15 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,011 mm | 980 mm | -979 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,499 mm | 1,511 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,407 mm | 1,427 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,062 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 983 mm | 930 mm | 53 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,496 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,410 mm | 1,425 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 937 mm | 1,019 mm | 936 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 950 mm | 0 mm | 950 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,349 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,151 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 886 mm | 0 mm | 886 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,901 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,080 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 385 L | 456 L | -71 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,243 L | 16.1 | -15.1 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,370 L | 16.1 | -14.1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford Explorer
| 2006 Ford Explorer Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 292-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Have driven from Maryland to Florida and back a couple of times, as well as 3-4 hours trips routinely. Seats are comfortable with no backache and don't have to stop every couple of hours due to fatigue. Could drive and be comfortable all day long. see full Ford Explorer review |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Lots of room. Great even in the 3rd rear bench see full Ford Explorer review |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Plenty of leg room see full Ford Explorer review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger
| 2016 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The Road & Track package includes some of the best front seats I've experienced. The side bolsters, though not adjustable, manage to effectively hold slender drivers in place without uncomfortably constraining far-from-slender ones. Synthetic suede center panels assist in this task. Yet as performance-oriented as these seats are, they aren't overly firm, and should prove comfortable even on day-long drives. Despite the more hardcore nature of the Chevrolet SS, its front seats have much smaller, far less effective bolsters. Some synthetic suede helps to mitigate this shortcoming, but the Dodge's buckets are much better for both comfort and support. see full Dodge Charger review | |
| 2016 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Dodge Charger's rear seat cushion is comfortably shaped and positioned. Rear knee room, though less abundant than the sedan's exterior dimensions might suggest, is neverless generous. So what is rear seat room doing among the reasons not to buy a Charger? Well, headroom is in short supply. People 5-11 and up could become painfully familiar with the backlight. Shorter passengers won't experience this issue, but could find the back seat uncomfortably confining because the smallish rear side windows descend only to neck level. For more rear headroom and larger rear side windows, check out the related Chrysler 300. Or the Chevrolet SS, which has 1.4 inches more rear headroom than the Charger. see full Dodge Charger review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
