| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2020 Ford Explorer and 2015 Dodge Charger Specifications
| Model Year | 2020 | 2015 | |
| Model | Ford Explorer | Dodge Charger | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,025 mm | 3,053 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,050 mm | 5,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 2,004 mm | 1,905 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,775 mm | 1,478 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,971 kg | 1,784 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 70 L | -2 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,034 mm | 980 mm | -979 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,570 mm | 1,511 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,504 mm | 1,427 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,062 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,029 mm | 930 mm | -929 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,572 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,501 mm | 1,425 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,019 mm | 990 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 988 mm | 0 mm | 988 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,387 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,039 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 818 mm | 0 mm | 818 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,883 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,080 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 515 L | 456 L | 59 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,356 L | 16.1 | -15.1 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,486 L | 16.1 | -14.1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Ford Explorer
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Ford Explorer.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Dodge Charger
| 2015 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The Road & Track package includes some of the best front seats I've experienced. The side bolsters, though not adjustable, manage to effectively hold slender drivers in place without uncomfortably constraining far-from-slender ones. Synthetic suede center panels assist in this task. Yet as performance-oriented as these seats are, they aren't overly firm, and should prove comfortable even on day-long drives. Despite the more hardcore nature of the Chevrolet SS, its front seats have much smaller, far less effective bolsters. Some synthetic suede helps to mitigate this shortcoming, but the Dodge's buckets are much better for both comfort and support. see full Dodge Charger review | |
| 2015 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Dodge Charger's rear seat cushion is comfortably shaped and positioned. Rear knee room, though less abundant than the sedan's exterior dimensions might suggest, is neverless generous. So what is rear seat room doing among the reasons not to buy a Charger? Well, headroom is in short supply. People 5-11 and up could become painfully familiar with the backlight. Shorter passengers won't experience this issue, but could find the back seat uncomfortably confining because the smallish rear side windows descend only to neck level. For more rear headroom and larger rear side windows, check out the related Chrysler 300. Or the Chevrolet SS, which has 1.4 inches more rear headroom than the Charger. see full Dodge Charger review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Dodge Charger
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Dodge Charger.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
