Ford Explorer (2009) vs. Kia Cadenza (2017) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2009 Ford Explorer and 2017 Kia Cadenza specs.
2009 Ford Explorer and 2017 Kia Cadenza Specifications
Model Year |
2009 |
2017 |
|
Model |
Ford Explorer |
Kia Cadenza |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr Sedan |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
2,888 mm |
2,855 mm |
0 mm |
Length |
4,912 mm |
4,971 mm |
0 mm |
Width |
1,872 mm |
1,869 mm |
0 mm |
Height |
1,849 mm |
1,471 mm |
0 mm |
Curb Weight |
2,014 kg |
1,648 kg |
1 kg |
Fuel Capacity |
85 L |
70 L |
15 L |
Headroom, Row 1 |
1,011 mm |
1,021 mm |
0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,499 mm |
1,481 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,407 mm |
1,435 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 |
1,077 mm |
1,156 mm |
0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 |
983 mm |
963 mm |
20 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,496 mm |
1,435 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,410 mm |
1,430 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 |
937 mm |
945 mm |
-8 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 |
950 mm |
0 mm |
950 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
1,349 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 |
1,151 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 |
886 mm |
0 mm |
886 mm |
Total Legroom |
2,901 mm (over 3 rows) |
2,101 mm (over 2 rows) |
0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
385 L |
453 L |
-68 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
1,243 L |
16.0 |
-15 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
2,370 L |
16.0 |
-14 L |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Ford Explorer
2008 |
4dr SUV 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
the front seat has plenty of leg room and seats hug you
see full Ford Explorer review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Kia Cadenza
2017 |
Due to its shorter greenhouse and taller, more intrusive center console, the Buick's front row doesn't feel nearly as roomy as the Kia's, or even as roomy as the related Chevrolet Malibu's. Large sedans aren't what they used to be. While in the past they were both longer and wider than midsize sedans, these days they more often than not share platforms with the latter, and thus are not significantly wider, only longer. Even in the official specs the LaCrosse has nearly an inch less front shoulder room than the "smaller" Malibu.
Likewise, the Cadenza's front row dimensions are within fractions of an inch of the Optima's. If you're seeking more front seat room than in a midsize sedan, you won't find it in these cars. To be fair, midsize sedans have grown.
Both the Cadenza and LaCrosse have comfortable front seats, with the Buick's cushion perhaps slightly cushier. Take a turn aggressively, though, and you're much more likely to slide off the Buick's non-bucket, as it provides hardly any lateral support. The Cadenza's bolsters are more effective.
The payoff for the additional size of these largish sedans can be found in the back seat, where each offers about two inches more legroom than its junior partner. On paper, the Kia Cadenza offers only slightly more total legroom than the Buick LaCrosse. In reality, it offers much more. With the front seat positioned for my 30-inch inseam (I'm not long of leg), I had about ten inches of knee room in the Kia's back seat. The Kia's rear seat cushion is also a little more supportive and comfortable than the Buick's.
Not so good: in both cars there's not enough space under the front seats for the rear seat passengers' feet, essentially robbing them of about a half-foot of legroom. This design flaw is more the rule than the exception in upscale sedans. Still, it's not right.
see full Kia Cadenza review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Kia Cadenza
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Kia Cadenza.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Ford models.