Model Year | 2020 | 2019 | |
Model | Ford Explorer | Mazda CX-5 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,025 mm | 2,697 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,050 mm | 4,549 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 2,004 mm | 1,842 mm | 1 mm |
Height | 1,775 mm | 1,659 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,971 kg | 1,606 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 56 L | 12 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,034 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,570 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,504 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,029 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,572 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,501 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,006 mm | 990 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 988 mm | 0 mm | 988 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,387 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,039 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 818 mm | 0 mm | 818 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,883 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 515 L | 875 L | -360 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,356 L | 30.9 | -29.9 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,486 L | 1,688 L | 1 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Ford Explorer.
2019 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5.