| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Ford Explorer and 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2013 | |
| Model | Ford Explorer | Mercedes-Benz GL | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,888 mm | 3,073 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,912 mm | 5,121 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,872 mm | 1,941 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,849 mm | 1,849 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,014 kg | 2,450 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 85 L | 100 L | -15 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,011 mm | 1,046 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,499 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,407 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 983 mm | 1,016 mm | 982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,496 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,410 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 937 mm | 978 mm | -41 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 950 mm | 988 mm | -38 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,349 mm | 1,283 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,151 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 886 mm | 889 mm | -3 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,901 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,891 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 385 L | 453 L | -68 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,243 L | 1,399 L | 0 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,370 L | 2,656 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Ford Explorer
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Ford Explorer.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL
| 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | The Mercedes-Benz GL-Class is just a little longer than the Audi Q7 (201.6 vs. 200.3 inches), and isn't as wide (76.4 vs. 78.1 inches). But the Mercedes is considerably taller (72.8 vs. 68.4 inches) and not nearly as curvy. Which might explain how it is far roomier than the much sleeker Audi. Combined legroom for all three rows is 107.6 inches in the Q7 vs. 113.8 inches in the GL-Class, a large difference. The Q7's space deficit grows the farther back you sit. For adults to even fit in the Audi's third row without extreme discomfort, those in the second row must slide their seats forward to the point that they are themselves short on knee room. While the new GL350's third row sits too low to provide thigh support, it's not nearly as cramped. Further evidence that Audi didn't intend the Q7's third row for frequent use: the second-row seat doesn't do a good job of getting out of the way, making the path in and out of the way-back perhaps the tightest I've experienced. The second-row seat in the GL-Class tips forward to open up a much wider path. If manually tipping the seat is too much of a chore (perhaps because you'e a five-year-old and haven't yet learned to read this), $400 buys a power assist. But even with this option the seat must be manually returned to its upright position, so the point eludes me. see full Mercedes-Benz GL review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
