| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2007 Ford Explorer and 2016 Toyota Prius Specifications
| Model Year | 2007 | 2016 | |
| Model | Ford Explorer | Toyota Prius | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,888 mm | 2,700 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,912 mm | 4,539 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,872 mm | 1,760 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,849 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,014 kg | 1,395 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 85 L | 43 L | 42 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,011 mm | 1,001 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,499 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,407 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,097 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 983 mm | 950 mm | 33 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,496 mm | 1,346 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,410 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 937 mm | 848 mm | 89 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 950 mm | 0 mm | 950 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,349 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,151 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 886 mm | 0 mm | 886 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,901 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,946 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 385 L | 697 L | -312 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,243 L | 24.6 | -23.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,370 L | 1,775 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Ford Explorer
| 2007 Ford Explorer Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
the front seat has plenty of leg room and seats hug you see full Ford Explorer review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 292-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Have driven from Maryland to Florida and back a couple of times, as well as 3-4 hours trips routinely. Seats are comfortable with no backache and don't have to stop every couple of hours due to fatigue. Could drive and be comfortable all day long. see full Ford Explorer review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius
| 2016 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review | |
| 2016 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
