Ford Flex (2012) vs. Mercedes-Benz GL (2013) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2012 Ford Flex and 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL specs.
2012 Ford Flex and 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL Specifications
Model Year |
2012 |
2013 |
|
Model |
Ford Flex |
Mercedes-Benz GL |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr SUV |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
2,995 mm |
3,073 mm |
-1 mm |
Length |
5,138 mm |
5,121 mm |
0 mm |
Width |
1,928 mm |
1,941 mm |
0 mm |
Height |
1,717 mm |
1,849 mm |
0 mm |
Curb Weight |
2,028 kg |
2,450 kg |
0 kg |
Fuel Capacity |
73 L |
100 L |
-27 L |
Headroom, Row 1 |
1,062 mm |
1,046 mm |
0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,483 mm |
1,486 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,407 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 |
1,036 mm |
1,024 mm |
0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 |
1,029 mm |
1,016 mm |
0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,450 mm |
1,481 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,397 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 |
1,125 mm |
978 mm |
-977 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 |
983 mm |
988 mm |
-5 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
1,290 mm |
1,283 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 |
1,044 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 |
848 mm |
889 mm |
-41 mm |
Total Legroom |
3,010 mm (over 3 rows) |
2,891 mm (over 3 rows) |
1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
549 L |
453 L |
96 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
1,274 L |
1,399 L |
0 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
2,455 L |
2,656 L |
0 L |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Flex
2011 |
4dr SUV turbocharged 355hp 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The seating throughout the vehicle is extremely roomy. Adults can fit comfortably in both the second and third row seats. The driver and passenger seats are also extremely comfortable.
see full Ford Flex review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL
2013 |
The Mercedes-Benz GL-Class is just a little longer than the Audi Q7 (201.6 vs. 200.3 inches), and isn't as wide (76.4 vs. 78.1 inches). But the Mercedes is considerably taller (72.8 vs. 68.4 inches) and not nearly as curvy. Which might explain how it is far roomier than the much sleeker Audi. Combined legroom for all three rows is 107.6 inches in the Q7 vs. 113.8 inches in the GL-Class, a large difference.
The Q7's space deficit grows the farther back you sit. For adults to even fit in the Audi's third row without extreme discomfort, those in the second row must slide their seats forward to the point that they are themselves short on knee room. While the new GL350's third row sits too low to provide thigh support, it's not nearly as cramped.
Further evidence that Audi didn't intend the Q7's third row for frequent use: the second-row seat doesn't do a good job of getting out of the way, making the path in and out of the way-back perhaps the tightest I've experienced. The second-row seat in the GL-Class tips forward to open up a much wider path. If manually tipping the seat is too much of a chore (perhaps because you'e a five-year-old and haven't yet learned to read this), $400 buys a power assist. But even with this option the seat must be manually returned to its upright position, so the point eludes me.
see full Mercedes-Benz GL review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Mercedes-Benz GL.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Ford models.