What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Ranger
2003 Ford Ranger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year
Body/Powertrain
Comment
2004
2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
The jump seats in a Ranger are not very practical for long trips what so ever, not much room other than for storage, and they are not comfortable. I think that a Full 4 door model of the Ranger would be great, maybe a redesign will incorporate a backseat
see full Ford Ranger review
2002
4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
The rear seats are very small but I did not buy it for rear seat comfort. I actually removed the seats to get more storage space behind the front seats.
see full Ford Ranger review
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009
2009 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year
Body/Powertrain
Comment
2009
0
I'm tall (6'1" or 183cm) - and I have an abnormally long back. The Honda Jazz (or Honda Fit) (2002-2014) is one of the few cars I can comfortably sit in the back seat. In most small cars - and some large cars - I touch the roof. Plus, the origamiversatility of the seating, conversion into storage is brilliant - and better than many far larger cars.
see full review
2009 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year
Body/Powertrain
Comment
2009
0
Only 'just' adequate for me at 6'1"/183cm. Taller or longer-limbed drivers would have problems, probably. Headroom is excellent.
see full review