Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2007 Kia Optima Kia Optima 2013

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Ranger (2007) vs. Kia Optima (2013) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2007 Ford Ranger and 2013 Kia Optima specs.

2007 Ford Ranger and 2013 Kia Optima Specifications

Model Year 2007 2013  
Model Ford Ranger Kia Optima  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Ford Ranger

2007 Ford Ranger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
The rear jump seats are suitable only for children. see full Ford Ranger review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Kia Optima

2013 Kia Optima Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
The Optima's rear seat is comfortably shaped, and includes plenty of room for passengers to stretch out their legs. Heads are a different matter. Though I'm only 5-9, if I still had much hair it would have been brushing the headliner. The Fusion provides a little more rear headroom, but less knee room. Buyers seeking a rear seat suitable for large adults won't be happy with this aspect of either car. see full Kia Optima review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Kia Optima

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Kia Optima.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all Pickups
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.